Archive for the ‘Branding’ Category

Reassessing your Museum brand for the funding crunch!

Monday, January 18th, 2010

museum

Reassessing your Museum brand
With the double whammy of funding cuts and stagnant sponsorship, Museums may feel that now would be the worst time to reassess their brands, but having a clear idea about what your organisation stands for and how it relates to your audiences is key to thriving in tough conditions.

Looking at your brand doesn’t have to mean an expensive new logo, it really starts with asking what makes your Museum special and thinking about how you can communicate that to your audiences.

When looking for the special ingredient that makes your Museum stand out, you need to think about this from the perspective of your audience. For example, you might have the best collection of Neolithic post in the country, but does that matter to those who work outside of the Museum?

The chances are that there is plenty to celebrate about your Museum and between you and your colleagues you will have a long list of unique selling propositions, now you need to look at these for a central message or a core value for your institution.

You might find it useful to do this with a group of your collegues (At Sumo we would do brand workshops with up to 100 staff at the start of a branding project).

Reconsidering your Museum brand
With a new central message for your Museum in mind, you need to look again at the marketing for your institution. If refreshing your logo is expensive and unlikely to happen while funding is tight, then look at the things that you can change such as tone of voice, photographic style, colour palette you’re your strapline.

How can each of these elements be used to communicate the brand of your Museum to audiences more effectively?

Refocusing your Museum brand
As well as considering how your brand can be communicated through touchpoints such as tone of voice and photography, you should also think about refocusing your marketing efforts towards low cost social media activities, which can expose your brand to new audiences without breaking the bank.

Rewarding your Museum brand
Having a clear idea about what you museum stands for, and communicating this effectively to your audiences will give your Museum stronger case for funding and make your institution more appealing to sponsors.

I also think that this kind of proactive attitude will also put the person who implements it in a stronger position within the Museum, which can’t be a bad thing under the current circumstances.

Brand building

Friday, July 3rd, 2009

I just stumbled across this on Slideshare, and having just spoken on a very similar theme, I thought it made some really good points, ‘Start looking at your marketing as a progressive story instead of as quarterly campaigns’.

No Logo = No Cash

Tuesday, June 30th, 2009

logo-taf

You might be aware of the recent ‘clash’ between The Art Fund and the Cambridge based Fitzwilliam Museum, as reported in The Art Newspaper this month.

The Fitzwilliam Museum has refused to display the logo of the Art Fund next to an artwork which they were seeking a £80,000 grant towards. The Director of the Museum, Dr Timothy Potts explained his stand on the issue.  “The Fitzwilliam Museum is being pressurised by the Art Fund on a highly controversial issue with which it strongly disagrees… Logos are the currency of marketing and commerce and this introduces a promotional element into the galleries that we regard as an unnecessary and unacceptable distraction — no matter how worthy the object of promotion… Needless to say the Fitzwilliam does, like all museums, provide a credit line for each object, in which the Art Fund would have been listed along with any other supporters of the acquisition.”

The Art Fund responded “We raise our funds from voluntary donations and subscriptions. Our logo on display labels allows potential members and supporters to see at a glance the sort of works that their money would help us buy”.

As a marketer I can appreciate the need for the Art Fund to maximize brand awareness, but as an art lover I think they are wrong to demand their logo be displayed next to every artwork they help to purchase.

The artwork that the Fitzwilliam Museum wished to buy would also have been funded by two other sources (MLA and V&A Purchase Grant Fund) and if one donor was allowed to have their logo displayed in the gallery, then wouldn’t everyone demand the same treatment? The result would be a terrible logo soup detracting from the art.

I would suggest that it would be more beneficial to The Art Fund to consider other ways of raising the awareness of their brand, for example, would having more detailed information about their work on display in the lobby of the Fitzwilliam Museum tell visitors more then a logo in the gallery? What do you think? 

Social media and the museum brand

Wednesday, June 24th, 2009

This is a short summary of the talk I am giving tomorrow at Communicating the Museum in Malaga:

Social media websites are some of the most popular places on the web and for museums they make it possible to connect and build relationships with your audiences, converting those with a passing interest into passionate advocates for your museum.

For those responsible for museum brands, the opportunities that social media provide come with new challenges: how can you control your brand is a space that offers little or no control.

The bad news is that whether you like it or not, nobody needs to ask your permission to talk about your museum on a blog or tell a friend about an exhibition on Facebook – positively or negatively – so your brand is already in this social media space.

You can’t control the conversation but you can participate in it. Take a minute to think about what your brand really is. Is it your logo? Is it your advertising campaign? Your collection? Your building? No, it is none of these things: your brand is the perception that people have of your organisation. You have never had total control over it, you have only ever been able to use all these touchpoints to help to shape this perception, and in the social media space that is no different.

Your first step in taking your museum and your brand into Social Media is learn about these websites and, most importantly, how your audiences are using them. Each website has a different set unwritten rules and spending time looking and listening helps you get into them. You start to realise that now any- and everybody gets to create content, distribute content and control their own user experiences and you can then consider how a museum can fit in to this.

Jumping into websites like Facebook, Twitter and Flickr without understanding how these spaces work can be damaging to a museum’s brand, because it projects the image of an institution who can’t be bothered to learn how a space which is important to its audiences works.

Social media is here to stay, it isn’t a fad, and while Facebook or Twitter may fade, people expecting to be part of the conversation rather then just talked at with not go away, and we need to adapt our brands to exist in this world.

Using branding to fight the funding crunch

Monday, April 6th, 2009

I read a piece recently in The Art Newspaper about how the economic crisis is affecting museums in the United States, with Directors of institutions big and small cutting budgets by between 5% – 20%, and preparing to make deeper cuts in 2010.

In the UK, we have the buffer of public funding (according to Arts and Business, private funding is currently at 13% of the total income of the cultural sector) which has meant that falling corporate sponsorship doesn’t result in such dramatic cuts. Nevertheless, with local authorities dealing with budget deficits and many DCMS funding agreements due to run out next March, museums in the UK are going to be fighting budget cuts in the coming year.

At first glance, branding might seem like an unlikely ally when making the case against any reduction in your operating budget [‘Surely now is the worst time to be spending more money on a flashy new logo’] but branding (when done properly) is a lot more than something new to put on your letterhead; it is the development and the communication of your vision for your organisation.

Developing this vision is the most important part of the branding process and it is most valuable when making your case for funding.

In my last piece, I talked about cultural organisations who I feel have lost their way in the current economic climate: clinging to a message of ‘cheapness’ rather than concentrating on their established USP and supporting this with a statement of value for money. Such an organisation can waste money changing their positioning and direction, or just simply ‘misfiring’ with their marketing. Conversely, an organisation which has a clear idea of what it stands for, which knows why it matters to its diverse audiences and which can communicate this clearly and effectively to funders is an efficient organisation going in a straight, upward line towards its future. This is what will appeal to funders wanting to be prudent with their money.

How this vision is formed is significant. We always encourage museums to involve people from across their organisation – this will give you as much information as possible on which to base your vision and make those in your organisation feel included and valued. If your organisation is facing tough times, having everyone behind one vision that they have ownership of is a powerful thing.

You may feel that you already have a vision for your organisation and you don’t feel that you need staff workshops to develop a new one, but consider who created this vision and when, if it differentiates you from other organisations and if it inspires people. Does your vision really represent what you aspire to do? We find that most museums we work with have an existing vision or mission statement, but these are seldom in the minds of, or meaningful to, people in the organisation, nor acknowledged by the audience.


Once you have developed your vision you need to communicate this effectively to all your audiences. This may require a development of your logo and brand style to bring them in line with this positioning, or an adjustment to your tone of voice in your communications; perhaps just the addition of a strapline to your marketing materials. This isn’t a just a task for your marketing team; everyone for within your organisation needs to play their part (which is another reason why it is wise to involve as many people in your organisation as possible in building that vision). This is because your brand is not your logo, website or advertising campaign – it is a perception formed in the minds of your audiences by everything that you do. This is also a chance to set out your aspirations for the future and to launch a fundraising campaign alongside the new brand to help make your new vision a reality.

We have a specific process for helping organisations define their positioning and a matrix to help you turn this into a communications plan. With the right approach, an with the relevant personnel involved from the start, this can be an efficient and very rewarding process.

The next couple of years will be an interesting time for the sector. We need to make a strong case for the important role that museums and galleries play in enriching peoples lives, and I believe that positioning and branding have an important role to play in beating the coming funding crunch. Arts and Business recently published a substantial report on the current financial state of the cultural sector and concluded: ‘recognising and maximising the leverage power of cultural organisations’ non-financial values cannot do any harm at a time when businesses are restructuring, re-assessing their prioritites and reconnecting with their core values.’

A question of branding

Monday, December 1st, 2008

The following is an extract from an interview I did about branding museums for Museum Practice Magazine:

Jim Richardson, a Director of the branding consultancy Sumo, who have created the new visual identities for Brighton & Hove Museums and Shetland Museum & Archives, agrees: “While it is easy to be seduced by pretty pictures, it is important to communicate to the designers where your organisation is and where it is heading. This is normally done in a written brief and through discussions with the designers. Having a well thought out brief will save you time and money”.

In the same way that a brand is not just a logo, a branding process is not just graphic design. It is about staff – from the Director and Trustees to the front of house – talking about what the museum means to them, what its collections hold and represent, what visitors say, what it stands for and how it might be improved. Involving people in this way should also help reduce any scepticism about the branding process itself.

Carrying out some basic market research yourself first may be sensible. “The first step is to research the perception of your organisation,” says Jim Richardson. “This doesn’t need to cost a lot of money – you can do it yourself by speaking to visitors about why they are visiting, whether they would recommend a visit to friends and family, and how they would describe the museum to other people. Also, involve people from across your organisation so they can see the benefits of the process first hand.”

If you have in-house designers or work regularly with a freelance, it is vital that they are involved from the beginning too, as they will be the people handling the design guidelines once the design process is finished.

“The next step is to compare this perception with how you would like to be seen,” says Richardson. “In order to change the perception of your museum, you may need to change exhibition displays, outreach programmes, advertising messages, price of entry, and many other things.”

The full article can be found in Museum Practice Magazine, Winter 2008

Branding a group of museums

Saturday, November 1st, 2008

brighton

The following is an extract from an interview I did with the Museums Journal:

This power to cross-promote venues efficiently is a good argument in favour of a group wide branding; it’s efficient, clear and brings cost benefits.

But bringing venues together in this way can be problematic. An umbrella brand may run the risk of eclipsing, or at worst obliterating, the distinct personality of individual museums, especially where institutions are disparate in nature. Tyne & Wear Museums rebranded its group identity in 2005, but purposely left individual sites with their own styles. The TWM identity is instead used as a kind of quality marquee to endorse the different services.

Jim Richardson, Director of branding group Sumo finds it’s an approach which works well. “It’s a strong but simple parent brand that sits in the corner of each leaflet, poster and so on, while each of their twelve venues has an individual identity. This really ticks two boxes: it lets the organisation cross-market the TWM brand, which also acts as a marquee of quality, and allows each venue the room to market themselves on their own merits.”

Perhaps the worse case scenario for group branding is the creation of a parent brand that doesn’t really mean anything to anyone. Richardson believes that monolithic branding can be taken too far.

“There has been a trend for implementing this kind of parent brand for a group of museums, often at the expense of the individual museums’ personalities,” says Richardson. “It’s important to leave room for museums to show what makes them special and not be too heavy handed with the brand. I think that the National Museum Wales and National Museums Scotland parent brands overpower the individual venues and become quite bland.”

The full article can be found in Museums Journal, December 2008