<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Cross platform Social Media editorial plan</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.museummarketing.co.uk/2010/01/26/cross-platform-social-media-editorial-plan/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.museummarketing.co.uk/2010/01/26/cross-platform-social-media-editorial-plan/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Jul 2010 20:15:17 +0100</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Facebook for a Museum &#8211; Part 3 &#171; Museum Marketing</title>
		<link>http://www.museummarketing.co.uk/2010/01/26/cross-platform-social-media-editorial-plan/comment-page-1/#comment-2376</link>
		<dc:creator>Facebook for a Museum &#8211; Part 3 &#171; Museum Marketing</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 17:49:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.museummarketing.co.uk/?p=656#comment-2376</guid>
		<description>[...] to your fan page.  Remember the social media editorial plan: I’ve written before about having a social media editorial plan for your activity on social networks. Ideally you want to plan out your updates in advance and [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] to your fan page.  Remember the social media editorial plan: I’ve written before about having a social media editorial plan for your activity on social networks. Ideally you want to plan out your updates in advance and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mia</title>
		<link>http://www.museummarketing.co.uk/2010/01/26/cross-platform-social-media-editorial-plan/comment-page-1/#comment-2099</link>
		<dc:creator>mia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2010 17:13:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.museummarketing.co.uk/?p=656#comment-2099</guid>
		<description>You are my social media godfather! Every post is so relevant to my life! I will have to try Hootsuite. Currently my &#039;edit plan&#039; consists of Outlook calendar reminders...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You are my social media godfather! Every post is so relevant to my life! I will have to try Hootsuite. Currently my &#8216;edit plan&#8217; consists of Outlook calendar reminders&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: samuel</title>
		<link>http://www.museummarketing.co.uk/2010/01/26/cross-platform-social-media-editorial-plan/comment-page-1/#comment-1996</link>
		<dc:creator>samuel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 15:28:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.museummarketing.co.uk/?p=656#comment-1996</guid>
		<description>@ben : it does ! just checked and you&#039;re absoluty right : it&#039;s an option. hopfully it is new...or i&#039;m a fool ;°) anyway, thank you so much for noticing. this will be very usefull to me. hootsuite is great.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ben : it does ! just checked and you&#8217;re absoluty right : it&#8217;s an option. hopfully it is new&#8230;or i&#8217;m a fool ;°) anyway, thank you so much for noticing. this will be very usefull to me. hootsuite is great.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben</title>
		<link>http://www.museummarketing.co.uk/2010/01/26/cross-platform-social-media-editorial-plan/comment-page-1/#comment-1979</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jan 2010 19:26:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.museummarketing.co.uk/?p=656#comment-1979</guid>
		<description>Samuel

Look at the screengrab above, it clearly shows Facebook Pages as an option, are you sure that this isn&#039;t something you can do on Hootsuite?

Perhaps this si a recent change?

Ben</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Samuel</p>
<p>Look at the screengrab above, it clearly shows Facebook Pages as an option, are you sure that this isn&#8217;t something you can do on Hootsuite?</p>
<p>Perhaps this si a recent change?</p>
<p>Ben</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: samuel</title>
		<link>http://www.museummarketing.co.uk/2010/01/26/cross-platform-social-media-editorial-plan/comment-page-1/#comment-1975</link>
		<dc:creator>samuel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jan 2010 17:16:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.museummarketing.co.uk/?p=656#comment-1975</guid>
		<description>i use hootsuite, very usefull when managing several twitter/FB accounts. but hootsuite doesn&#039;t update FB pages but only profiles (which i don&#039;t use for the museum i work at). I&#039;ve been looking for a solution (any app that would update FB pages, directly or via twitter) but could not find any...any idea ? thank you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i use hootsuite, very usefull when managing several twitter/FB accounts. but hootsuite doesn&#8217;t update FB pages but only profiles (which i don&#8217;t use for the museum i work at). I&#8217;ve been looking for a solution (any app that would update FB pages, directly or via twitter) but could not find any&#8230;any idea ? thank you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mario Di Maggio</title>
		<link>http://www.museummarketing.co.uk/2010/01/26/cross-platform-social-media-editorial-plan/comment-page-1/#comment-1974</link>
		<dc:creator>Mario Di Maggio</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jan 2010 14:53:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.museummarketing.co.uk/?p=656#comment-1974</guid>
		<description>Hootsuite sounds useful, yet currently we&#039;re set up so that everything I add to our planetarium Facebook page gets automatically Tweeted anyway. This of course means making sure the first 100 characters or make sense on Twitter (together with the automatic link generated to Facebook).

Btw, what I&#039;ve found REALLY useful recently is the new free, automatic Newsletter facility for Facebook pages ie. allowing fans who are not Facebook junkies to remain updated via a digest email to their inbox.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hootsuite sounds useful, yet currently we&#8217;re set up so that everything I add to our planetarium Facebook page gets automatically Tweeted anyway. This of course means making sure the first 100 characters or make sense on Twitter (together with the automatic link generated to Facebook).</p>
<p>Btw, what I&#8217;ve found REALLY useful recently is the new free, automatic Newsletter facility for Facebook pages ie. allowing fans who are not Facebook junkies to remain updated via a digest email to their inbox.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sean money</title>
		<link>http://www.museummarketing.co.uk/2010/01/26/cross-platform-social-media-editorial-plan/comment-page-1/#comment-1973</link>
		<dc:creator>sean money</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jan 2010 14:26:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.museummarketing.co.uk/?p=656#comment-1973</guid>
		<description>Here are some other options.

Cotweet (similar to hootsuite in functionality) can post to facebook, and other social networks using ping.fm http://blog.cotweet.com/2009/10/post-to-facebook-pages-linkedin-and-more/

Cotweet- is a web based twitter client: allows multiple accounts and multiple users, email notifications, scheduling of tweets, you can assign different members of your team to handle specific tweets, it threads conversations, and has bit.ly integration (i dislike the ow.ly iframe)

While i use cotweet for twitter. I still prefer &quot;Selective Twitter&quot; for posting to facebook from twitter. By adding the hastag #fb to any tweet, it will be synced to facebook 
http://apps.facebook.com/selectivetwitter/

and there is always tweetdeck http://www.tweetdeck.com/ which last time i checked can display and post to twitter, facebook and myspace.

@seanmoney</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here are some other options.</p>
<p>Cotweet (similar to hootsuite in functionality) can post to facebook, and other social networks using ping.fm <a href="http://blog.cotweet.com/2009/10/post-to-facebook-pages-linkedin-and-more/" rel="nofollow">http://blog.cotweet.com/2009/10/post-to-facebook-pages-linkedin-and-more/</a></p>
<p>Cotweet- is a web based twitter client: allows multiple accounts and multiple users, email notifications, scheduling of tweets, you can assign different members of your team to handle specific tweets, it threads conversations, and has bit.ly integration (i dislike the ow.ly iframe)</p>
<p>While i use cotweet for twitter. I still prefer &#8220;Selective Twitter&#8221; for posting to facebook from twitter. By adding the hastag #fb to any tweet, it will be synced to facebook<br />
<a href="http://apps.facebook.com/selectivetwitter/" rel="nofollow">http://apps.facebook.com/selectivetwitter/</a></p>
<p>and there is always tweetdeck <a href="http://www.tweetdeck.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.tweetdeck.com/</a> which last time i checked can display and post to twitter, facebook and myspace.</p>
<p>@seanmoney</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Conxa Rodà</title>
		<link>http://www.museummarketing.co.uk/2010/01/26/cross-platform-social-media-editorial-plan/comment-page-1/#comment-1971</link>
		<dc:creator>Conxa Rodà</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jan 2010 13:06:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.museummarketing.co.uk/?p=656#comment-1971</guid>
		<description>Hi, Jim,
Very interesting topic, indeed! And the daily battle, as well.
Our museum entered on 2.0 networks in May last year. We have presence at 6 now (the most usual: Fb, Twitter, Flickr, Youtube, Slideshare, Delicious + we publish a blog). All media are accessible from one page http://www.bcn.cat/museupicasso/en/get-involved/online-community.html

For the first phase of uploading content and designing the different platforms we got some external support and to lead this phase and write content it was myself (mainly). Now  that our presence is expanded and more interaction is generated, we are in the process of creating an editorial team:

-we are assigning the responsibility of “curating” 1 or 2 networks to specific staff members (which includes the 3 aspects you mention: listening, interacting and providing content) 

-and we have editorial meetings to share and discuss our strategy, weekly (or more often if it’s needed).

What I would disagree is to the idea of “using the same message on your different networks.”
If doing so you may appear too insistent or repetitive to your users that follow you on different networks, plus I believe each platform has a specific way of expression that cannot be reproduced automatically. Sure it saves time, but it also diminishes effectiveness, I think.

Thank you
Conxa
@innova2</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi, Jim,<br />
Very interesting topic, indeed! And the daily battle, as well.<br />
Our museum entered on 2.0 networks in May last year. We have presence at 6 now (the most usual: Fb, Twitter, Flickr, Youtube, Slideshare, Delicious + we publish a blog). All media are accessible from one page <a href="http://www.bcn.cat/museupicasso/en/get-involved/online-community.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.bcn.cat/museupicasso/en/get-involved/online-community.html</a></p>
<p>For the first phase of uploading content and designing the different platforms we got some external support and to lead this phase and write content it was myself (mainly). Now  that our presence is expanded and more interaction is generated, we are in the process of creating an editorial team:</p>
<p>-we are assigning the responsibility of “curating” 1 or 2 networks to specific staff members (which includes the 3 aspects you mention: listening, interacting and providing content) </p>
<p>-and we have editorial meetings to share and discuss our strategy, weekly (or more often if it’s needed).</p>
<p>What I would disagree is to the idea of “using the same message on your different networks.”<br />
If doing so you may appear too insistent or repetitive to your users that follow you on different networks, plus I believe each platform has a specific way of expression that cannot be reproduced automatically. Sure it saves time, but it also diminishes effectiveness, I think.</p>
<p>Thank you<br />
Conxa<br />
@innova2</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
